Key Finding 6:

Mild but Distinct Signals Around Stack Feature Usefulness

While responses to Q12 (usefulness of managing tools through saving, organising, and revisiting) did not reveal a sharply polarised pattern, a few meaningful trends emerged when comparing multi-tool and single-tool users.

Single-tool users showed slightly higher overall enthusiasm for tool management features:

• Most responses clustered around ratings 4 and 5, suggesting they find value in having structured support to keep track of tools they’ve used or want to return to.

• A small number of low-stress single-tool users rated this feature as “Not helpful”, indicating that perceived usefulness may diminish when users feel less overwhelmed or less dependent on external structure.

Multi-tool users, in contrast, tended to provide more neutral ratings, often selecting 3 or “Ok to have.” This suggests they may not see immediate personal benefit, perhaps because they already maintain their own discovery workflows. However, the group showed fewer rejections overall, and no strong resistance — indicating an open but uncommitted stance toward Stack-like functionality.

Taken together, this suggests that Stack’s perceived value is clearest for users who feel less in control of their tool usage — while those already managing multiple tools independently remain open but require more compelling reasons to engage.